Miss Chief Eagle Testickle

Native Americans wearing thigh-high platform moccasins?  A head dress made of pink feather boas?  A recreated tipi decorated with Louis Vuitton suitcases and a chandelier?  Kent Monkman, a noted Canadian artist, has used his native Cree heritage to create paintings, films, installations and performances that question and challenge traditional perspectives of native peoples.  His artwork also addresses the strong gender roles associated with native peoples and overly masculine frontier cowboys.  Jessica Lack, from The Guardian newspaper, noted of Monkman in 2008: “Funny and politically incisive, his injection of some Cher-like glamour into the heart of America’s butch psyche is like throwing a Versace wedge into an auto-repair shop.” Monkman’s alter-ego, Miss Chief Eagle Testickle, is a modern interpretation of a berdache or a two-spirit, a native person who fulfills mixed gender roles. 

George Catlin first documented a two-spirit in his painting, Dance to the Berdache (1832-1839), in which a tribe is shown celebrating an individual wearing both male and female dress.  Catlin and now Monkman have completely flipped the universal view of the warrior or noble savage.  Miss Chief appears in Monkman’s paintings which usually depict a traditional nineteenth century landscape and figures representing or engaging in mixed gender roles. 

So far, Monkman has been warmly received and reviewed by the art community, but it is unclear how other native peoples view his representations.  Do Monkman’s interpretations actually challenge traditional masculine perceptions of native peoples?  Is this method of art and performance too obscure and limiting for broader audiences?  Should Monkman focus more on accurate historical representations such as that in Catlin’s work instead of using a combination of traditional and modern interpretation?

2 thoughts on “Miss Chief Eagle Testickle

  1. This guy is brilliant!! I have seen one of his shows and found it the most pointed comment on colonial stereotypes as well as gender and “history” commentary. As a white female anthropologist and artist I may view this from a perspective slightly askew from the “art community” or the “native peoples” mentioned above. But I find this work refreshingly unaploogetic, bold and humorous, not to mention technically extremely accomplished
    “Should Monkman focus more on accurate historical representations such as that in Catlin’s work instead of using a combination of traditional and modern interpretation?” Monkman should do exactly what Monkman does. Juxtaposing traditional and modern interpretation is one of the things that make his work so powerful. And anyway, isn’t “accurate historical representation” an oxymoron? I found his work to be the most amusing, insightful and skilled that I have seen in years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s